..:: Learn the latest news ::..

Other News Added

:: 14 May 2007
Intracoronary infusion of the mobilized peripheral blood stem cell by G-CSF is better than mobilization alone by G-CSF for improvement of cardiac function and remodeling: 2-year follow-up results of the Myocardial Regeneration and Angiogenesis in Myocardial Infarction with G-CSF and Intra-Coronary Stem Cell Infusion (MAGIC Cell) 1 trial.

:: 14 May 2007
Initial clinical trials of bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cells after acute myocardial infarction have shown improvement in a number of cardiac indices, including left ventricular systolic function, infarct size, stroke volume, and coronary blood flow.

:: 13 May 2007
Heart failure is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. In some patients, current treatment modalities may not be adequate to prevent myocardial remodeling, which leads to exacerbation of the disease. Cell therapy is based on the premise of replacing damaged myocardium with functional tissues. Multiple forms of stem cells, including bone marrow-derived stem cells and skeletal myoblasts, have been investigated using several delivery routes of administration. Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain the beneficial effects of cell-based therapy. These include cell transdifferentiation, cell fusion, and release of paracrine growth factors. The beneficial effects of cell therapy may involve multiple mechanisms. The encouraging results of early clinical cell therapy studies have not been sustained by subsequent robust studies. These findings suggest that many unanswered questions need to be addressed before cell therapy becomes an acceptable adjunctive treatment for heart failure.

:: 13 May 2007
Intracoronary infusion of selected CD133(+) and CD133(-)CD34(+) progenitor cells to a previously infarcted and nonviable anterior wall is safe, and results in sustained improvement in segmental myocardial perfusion and in favorable left ventricular remodeling.

Future use of adult stem cells: In the future, it may be possible for a person to use a sample of his or her own stem cells to regenerate tissue, which would reduce or even eliminate the danger of rejection. How might this be done? Some possibilities include:

• Collecting healthy adult stem cells from a patient and manipulating them in the laboratory to create new tissue. The tissue would be re-transplanted back into the patient's body, where it would work to restore a lost function.
• Therapeutic cloning might enable the creation of embryonic stem cells that are genetically identical to the patient.
• One less invasive way to achieve this goal would be to manipulate existing stem cells within the body to perform therapeutic tasks. For example, scientists might design a drug that would direct a certain type of stem cell to restore a lost function inside the patient's body. This approach would eliminate the need for invasive surgical procedures to harvest and transplant stem cells.